Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-21-2015
Abstract
The ability of light and dark roasted coffee (1 g/kg) in varying application forms (spent ground [SCG], whole ground [WGC], or lyophilized brew [LBC]) to inhibit lipid and protein oxidation in cooked pork patties stored at −18 °C was monitored over 3 months. Malondialdehyde (MDA) for the negative control (NC) increased from 0.31 to 1.11 mg MDA/kg pork over 3 months, while pork with coffee or rosemary oleoresin had lower values at month 3 (0.054–0.40 mg MDA/kg pork). The NC had the highest values for hexanal, octanal, and nonanal (2.59, 0.10, and 0.13 mg/kg pork, respectively), while light and dark LBC in pork inhibited hexanal (0.37 and 0.39 mg/kg pork), octanal (0.017 and 0.021 mg/kg pork), and nonanal (0.036 and 0.048 mg/kg pork) to the same extent as rosemary oleoresin at month 3 (0.30, 0.015, 0.036 mg aldehyde/kg pork, respectively). Thiol content for all treatments remained relatively stable from month 0–3 (0.56–0.96 to 0.67–1.02), while metmyoglobin slightly increased (49–55% to 55–56%) over 3 months. The results suggest that adding coffee neither inhibited nor promoted protein oxidation in cooked pork patties but inhibited lipid oxidation resulting in comparable values to pork with added rosemary oleoresin.
Recommended Citation
Jully, K.M.M., Toto, C.S., Were, L., 2016. Antioxidant effect of spent, ground, and lyophilized brew from roasted coffee in frozen cooked pork patties. LWT - Food Science and Technology 66, 244–251. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.046
Peer Reviewed
1
Copyright
Elsevier
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Comments
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in LWT - Food Science and Technology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in LWT - Food Science and Technology, volume 66, in 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.046
The Creative Commons license below applies only to this version of the article.