Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-16-2018
Abstract
A hopeful vision of the future is a world in which both people and nature thrive, but there is little evidence to support the feasibility of such a vision. We used a global, spatially explicit, systems modeling approach to explore the possibility of meeting the demands of increased populations and economic growth in 2050 while simultaneously advancing multiple conservation goals. Our results demonstrate that if, instead of “business as usual” practices, the world changes how and where food and energy are produced, this could help to meet projected increases in food (54%) and energy (56%) demand while achieving habitat protection (>50% of natural habitat remains unconverted in most biomes globally; 17% area of each ecoregion protected in each country), reducing atmospheric greenhouse-gas emissions consistent with the Paris Climate Agreement (≤1.6°C warming by 2100), ending overfishing, and reducing water stress and particulate air pollution. Achieving this hopeful vision for people and nature is attainable with existing technology and consumption patterns. However, success will require major shifts in production methods and an ability to overcome substantial economic, social, and political challenges.
Recommended Citation
Tallis HM, Hawthorne PL, Polasky S, et al. 2018. An attainable global vision for conservation and human well-being. Front Ecol Environ 16(10): 563–570, https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1965
WebFigure 1
fee1965-sup-0002-webfigure2.pdf (201 kB)
WebFigure 2
fee1965-sup-0003-webfigure3.pdf (330 kB)
WebFigure 3
fee1965-sup-0004-panels1.pdf (187 kB)
WebPanel 1
fee1965-sup-0005-webtable1.pdf (265 kB)
WebTable 1
fee1965-sup-0006-webtable2.pdf (128 kB)
WebTable 2
fee1965-sup-0007-webtable3.pdf (74 kB)
WebTable 3
fee1965-sup-0008-webtable4.pdf (49 kB)
WebTable 4
Copyright
The Ecological Society of America
Included in
Agriculture Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Sustainability Commons
Comments
This article was originally published in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, volume 16, issue 10, in 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1965