Bhati and Arvind (2022)[Phys. Lett. A, 127955 (2022)] recently argued that in a specially designed experiment the timing of photon detection events demonstrates photon presence at a location at which they are not present according to the weak value approach. The alleged contradiction is resolved by a subtle interference effect resulting in anomalous sensitivity of the signal imprinted on the postselected photons for the interaction at this location, similarly to the case of a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer with a Dove prism (Alonso and Jordan (2015)). We perform an in-depth analysis of the characterization of the presence of a pre- and postselected particle at a particular location based on information imprinted on the particle itself. The theoretical results are tested by a computer simulation of the proposed experiment.
G. Reznik, C. Versmold, J. Dziewior, F. Huber, S. Bagchi, H. Weinfurter, J. Dressel, and L. Vaidman. Photons are lying about where they have been, again. Phys. Lett. A, 470, 128782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2023.128782
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Available for download on Saturday, March 22, 2025
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Physics Letters A. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Physics Letters A, volume 2023, in date. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2023.128782
The Creative Commons license below applies only to this version of the article.