Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-18-2017
Abstract
Perceptions of neighborhood disorder (trash, vandalism) and cohesion (neighbors trust one another) are related to residents’ health. Affective and behavioral factors have been identified, but often in studies using geographically select samples. We use a nationally representative sample (n = 9032) of United States older adults from the Health and Retirement Study to examine cardiometabolic risk in relation to perceptions of neighborhood cohesion and disorder. Lower cohesion is significantly related to greater cardiometabolic risk in 2006/2008 and predicts greater risk four years later (2010/2012). The longitudinal relation is partially accounted for by anxiety and physical activity.
Recommended Citation
Robinette, J. W., Charles, S. T., & Gruenewald, T. L. (2018). Neighborhood cohesion, neighborhood disorder, and cardiometabolic risk. Social Science & Medicine, 198, 70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.025
Copyright
Elsevier
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Included in
Cardiovascular Diseases Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Community-Based Research Commons, Community Psychology Commons, Health Psychology Commons, Human Factors Psychology Commons, Other Psychology Commons, Personality and Social Contexts Commons, Place and Environment Commons, Social Psychology Commons, Social Psychology and Interaction Commons, Sociology of Culture Commons
Comments
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Social Science & Medicine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Social Science & Medicine, volume 198, in 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.025
The Creative Commons license below applies only to this version of the article.