Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-10-2024
Abstract
Recent developments in the foundations of physics have given rise to a class of views suggesting that physically meaningful descriptions must always be relativized to a physical perspective. In this article, I distinguish between strong physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all facts must be relativized to a perspective, and moderate physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all empirically meaningful descriptions must be relativized to a perspective. I argue that scientific evidence and philosophical considerations support moderate physical perspectivalism over strong physical perspectivalism. In particular, motivations connected to epistemic humility and the social nature of science are more compatible with the moderate approach.
Recommended Citation
Adlam, Emily. “Moderate Physical Perspectivalism.” Philosophy of Science 92.3 (2025): 624–645. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.73
Peer Reviewed
1
Copyright
The author
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
This article was originally published in Philosophy of Science, volume 92, issue 3, in 2025. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.73