Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Abstract
PURPOSE—This study investigated the efficacy and safety of vorinostat, a deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, in the treatment of laser-induced corneal haze following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in rabbits in vivo and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1) -induced corneal fibrosis in vitro.
METHODS—Corneal haze in rabbits was produced with −9.00 diopters (D) PRK. Fibrosis in cultured human and rabbit corneal fibroblasts was activated with TGFβ1. Vorinostat (25 μm) was topically applied once for 5 minutes on rabbit cornea immediately after PRK for in vivo studies. Vorinostat (0 to 25 μm) was given to human/rabbit corneal fibroblasts for 5 minutes or 48 hours for in vitro studies. Slit-lamp microscopy, TUNEL assay, and trypan blue were used to determined vorinostat toxicity, whereas real-time polymerase chain reaction, immunocytochemistry, and immunoblotting were used to measure its efficacy.
RESULTS—Single 5-minute vorinostat (25 μm) topical application on the cornea following PRK significantly reduced corneal haze (Pin vivoscreened 4 weeks after PRK. Vorinostat reduced TGFβ1-induced fibrosis in human and rabbit corneas in vitro in a dose-dependent manner without altering cellular viability, phenotype, or proliferation.
CONCLUSIONS—Vorinostat is non-cytotoxic and safe for the eye and has potential to prevent laser-induced corneal haze in patients undergoing PRK for high myopia.
Recommended Citation
Tandon A, Tovey JCK, Waggoner MR, et al. Vorinostat: A Potent Agent to Prevent and Treat Laser-induced Corneal Haze. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(4):285-290. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20120210-01.
Copyright
Slack
Included in
Animal Experimentation and Research Commons, Animals Commons, Musculoskeletal, Neural, and Ocular Physiology Commons, Ophthalmology Commons, Other Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Commons
Comments
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Refractive Surgery, volume 28, issue 4, in 2012 following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20120210-01.