Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-11-2026

Abstract

Background   Treatment of Bone and joint infections (BJIs) with oral antibiotics may have benefits compared to IV therapy. Yet oral treatment options may be limited by lack of options due to antibiotic-resistant pathogens and tolerability concerns. Omadacycline has in vitro activity against common BJI pathogens, including MRSA and most Enterobacterales. However, real-world susceptibility data and implications for oral therapy are limited.   Methods

We conducted a descriptive analysis of data from adult patients enrolled to date in an open-label, randomized controlled trial of comparing omadacycline-containing antibiotic regimen vs. standard of care (SOC) antibiotics for BJIs. Omadaycline susceptibility was assessed on available clinical isolates using MIC Test Strips (Liofilchem®). Susceptibility to omadacycline was interpreted using FDA breakpoints where available or extrapolated for organisms without criteria. We also described omadacycline-containing vs. SOC regimens (provider-chosen) among randomized patients to assess the proportion of oral vs. IV therapies. Results

To date, we screened 162 patients and randomized 132 (81%). Most randomized patients had diabetic foot infections (113/132 (86%)). Among screened patients, bacterial isolates were recovered from 144 (89%) participants. The most frequently identified isolates were Streptococcus spp. (37%), S. aureus (22%), 24% of which were MRSA, followed by and Enterobaterales (19%). Susceptibility data are summarized in Table 1. Among randomized patients and prior to randomization, 122/132 (92%) of omadacycline contating regimens would be oral-only therapy, compared to 100/132 (76%) in the SOC arm (p< 0.001). Conclusion

In our randomized trial of BJI treatment, omadacycline demonstrated in vitro activity against most BJI pathogens, including Streptococcus, MRSA and Enterobacterales. A higher proportion of omadacycline-containing regimens were eligible for oral-only therapy compared to SOC. In light of these findings, omadacycline may warrant consideration as an oral option in select BJI cases.

Comments

This article was originally published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, volume 13, supplement 1, in 2026. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf695.307

Copyright

The authors

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.