Title
Judging What’s Vital—The Problems of Measuring Progress in Unconventional Wars
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2011
Abstract
"Examining editorials on the war in Afghanistan during the first half of 2011 leaves one hesitant to proffer a judgment on American strategy. In fact, evaluations of the war’s progress have varied so widely in recent months that the very concept of measuring 'progress' appears at best a questionable endeavor."
Recommended Citation
Daddis, Gregory A., “Judging What’s Vital—The Problems of Measuring Progress in Unconventional Wars,” History News Network (April 2011): http://hnn.us/articles/138629.html.
Copyright
History News Network
Comments
This article was originally published in History News Network in April 2011.