Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-5-2024

Abstract

This paper bridges large but separate literatures on decision-making under ambiguity, the dual system framework of behavioral economics, and market design. We characterize behavior under ambiguity arising from dual system preferences. Rational System 2 satisfies the subjective expected utility axioms while behavioral System 1 satisfies the obvious dominance axiom from mechanism design. Our axioms provide a novel foundation for the popular NEO-EU ambiguity model and allow for source dependent ambiguity perceptions. Our approach also provides an explanation as to how behavioral differences arise between obviously strategy-proof mechanisms (e.g. English auctions) and other mechanisms. Empirically, we find ambiguity perceptions are lower for individuals who engage in reflective System 2 reasoning. Further, ambiguity perceptions regarding auction prices increase with the mechanism’s strategic complexity (lowest for obviously strategy-proof English auctions, intermediate for strategy-proof second-price auctions, highest for non-strategy proof first-price and Dutch auctions). However, ambiguity attitudes, representing preferences, are stable across auction formats.

Comments

ESI Working Paper 24-04

Formerly titled "Ambiguity and Ambiguity Attitudes across Auctions"

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.