Exchange, Theft, and the Social Formation of Property
We design a laboratory experiment to explore whether and how property endogenously arises in a specialization and exchange environment where “theft” is costless. Additional treatments make available optional private protection mechanisms. We find that although an absence of exogenous enforcement does not hamper property's emergence in all cases, the private options tend to worsen outcomes on average. Property emerges when subjects self-organize groups, understand potential gains from trade, convince group members that all benefit by avoiding theft, and display credible commitment to cooperation in their actions. In other words, as Hume argued in 1740, property is a convention.
Kimbrough, E., Smith, V. and Wilson, B. "Exchange, Theft, and the Social Formation of Property." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(3), p. 206-229, June, 2010.
This article was originally published in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, volume 74, issue 3, in 2010.
The link above is to the authoritative publisher’s version, as noted by the Economic Science Institute, and may reside behind a paywall. If denied access, Chapman students, faculty, and staff should try this link.