Health Costs of Reproduction are Minimal Despite High Fertility, Mortality and Subsistence Lifestyle
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-20-2016
Abstract
Women exhibit greater morbidity than men despite higher life expectancy. An evolutionary life history framework predicts that energy invested in reproduction trades-off against investments in maintenance and survival. Direct costs of reproduction may therefore contribute to higher morbidity, especially for women given their greater direct energetic contributions to reproduction. We explore multiple indicators of somatic condition among Tsimane forager-horticulturalist women (Total Fertility Rate = 9.1; n = 592 aged 15–44 years, n = 277 aged 45+). We test whether cumulative live births and the pace of reproduction are associated with nutritional status and immune function using longitudinal data spanning 10 years. Higher parity and faster reproductive pace are associated with lower nutritional status (indicated by weight, body mass index, body fat) in a cross-section, but longitudinal analyses show improvements in women’s nutritional status with age. Biomarkers of immune function and anemia vary little with parity or pace of reproduction. Our findings demonstrate that even under energy-limited and infectious conditions, women are buffered from the potential depleting effects of rapid reproduction and compound offspring dependency characteristic of human life histories.
Recommended Citation
Gurven, M., Costa, M., Trumble, B., et al. (2016). Health costs of reproduction are minimal despite high fertility, mortality and subsistence lifestyle. Scientific Reports, 6, 30056. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30056
Supplementary Information
Peer Reviewed
1
Copyright
The authors cc-by
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Included in
Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, Economic Theory Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Other Anthropology Commons, Other Economics Commons, Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons
Comments
This article was originally published in Scientific Reports, volume 6, in 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30056