Modalities in the Stone Age: A Comparison of Coalgebraic Logics
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Abstract
Coalgebra develops a general theory of transition systems, parametric in a functor T; the functor T specifies the possible one-step behaviours of the system. A fundamental question in this area is how to obtain, for an arbitrary functor T, a logic for T-coalgebras. We compare two existing proposals, Moss’s coalgebraic logic and the logic of all predicate liftings, by providing one-step translations between them, extending the results in Raul Andres Leal (2008) [34] by making systematic use of Stone duality. Our main contribution then is a novel coalgebraic logic, which can be seen as an equational axiomatisation of Moss’s logic. The three logics are equivalent for a natural but restricted class of functors. We give examples showing that the logics differ in general. Finally, we argue that the quest for a generic logic for T-coalgebras is still open in the general case.
Recommended Citation
A. Kurz and R. Leal, “Modalities in the Stone age: A comparison of coalgebraic logics,” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 430, pp. 88–116, Apr. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2012.03.027
Copyright
Elsevier
Comments
This article was originally published in Theoretical Computer Science, volume 430, in 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2012.03.027