Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-5-2018
Abstract
This paper explores convergences and discrepancies between liberation theology and the works of Karl Marx through the dialogue between one of the key contemporary proponents of liberation theology, Peter McLaren, and the agnostic scholar in critical pedagogy, Petar Jandrić. The paper briefly outlines liberation theology and its main convergences with the works of Karl Marx. Exposing striking similarities between the two traditions in denouncing the false God of money, it explores differences in their views towards individualism and collectivism. It rejects shallow rhetorical homologies between Marx and the Bible often found in liberation theology, and suggests a change of focus from seeking a formal or Cartesian logical consistency between Marxism and Christianity to exploring their dialectical consistency. Looking at Marxist and Christian approaches to morality, it outlines close links between historical materialism and questions of value. It concludes that the shared eschaton of Marxism and the Christianity gives meaning to human history and an opportunity to change it.
Recommended Citation
McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2018). Karl Marx and liberation theology: Dialectical materialism and Christian spirituality in, against, and beyond contemporary capitalism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16(2): 598-607. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v16i2.965
Peer Reviewed
1
Copyright
The authors
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Included in
Christianity Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Comparative Philosophy Commons, Economic Theory Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, History of Christianity Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Other Economics Commons, Other Philosophy Commons, Other Religion Commons, Practical Theology Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons
Comments
This article was originally published in tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, volume 16, issue 2, in 2018. DOI: 10.31269/triplec.v16i2.965