Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-21-2014

Abstract

This article examines the impact of the distribution of preferences on equilibrium behavior in conflicts modeled as all-pay auctions with identity-dependent externalities. Centrists and radicals are defined using a willingness-to-pay criterion that admits preferences more general than a simple ordering on the line. Extremism, characterized by a higher per capita expenditure by radicals than centrists, may persist and generate higher aggregate expenditure by radicals, even when they are relatively small in number. Our results demonstrate the importance of the institutions of conflict in determining the role of extremism and moderation in economic, political, and social environments.

Comments

This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Social Choice and Welfare, to be assigned to a future volume, in 2014 following peer review. The final publication is available at Springer via DOI: 10.1007/s00355-014-0864-1.

Peer Reviewed

1

Copyright

Springer

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.