Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-28-2025
Abstract
This study investigates whether generative AI can narrow the gap between stronger and developing writers and explores the mechanisms underlying these effects. In a within-subject experiment, students wrote two essays, with and without AI assistance. Computer-aided analysis of the writing quality confirmed that while all students benefited from AI, that less skillful writers gained more. There was also no evidence of skillful writers using AI in more sophisticated and beneficial ways. The study contributes to theorizing the digital divide and offers insights into maximizing the benefits of AI tools. Theoretically, we situate generative-AI use within Diffusion of Innovations, treating ChatGPT as an innovation whose consequences depend on implementation quality (prompting and editing), and we show equity-enhancing—rather than inequality-widening—consequences under specific use patterns.
Recommended Citation
Tukachinsky Forster, R., Kee, K. & Li, G. From digital divide to equity-enhancing diffusion: Generative AI and writing quality. AI & Soc (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02739-3
Supplementary Information
Copyright
The authors
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Included in
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons, Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Other Communication Commons
Comments
This article was originally published in AI & Society in 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02739-3