Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-12-2025

Abstract

Despite the growing emphasis on performance measurement, empirical evidence linking the selection of performance measures to distinct organizational characteristics remains limited. Moreover, practical guidance on selecting appropriate performance measures for different organizational contexts is often ambiguous or absent. This study addresses these gaps through a large-scale empirical analysis of 372 organizations across diverse industry sectors. It provides validation for the hypothesized contingency effects of various organizational characteristics—such as size, structure, and global exposure—on performance measurement choices. The findings support our contention that no single performance measure is universally optimal; rather, the suitability of specific measures depends on the organization’s contextual attributes. By integrating both operational and relational performance dimensions, the study offers a comprehensive framework for understanding how organizational contingencies shape measurement practices. The results yield actionable implications for managers, enabling them to align their performance measurement systems with organizational characteristics, thereby enhancing resource allocation, strategic decision-making, and their ability to compete.

Comments

This article was originally published in International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness in 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-025-00139-4

Peer Reviewed

1

Copyright

The authors

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.