Marginalized, Secularized, and Popularized? The Prevalence and Patterns of Paranormal Belief in the United Kingdom

Authors

Tom Clark, University of Sheffield
Joseph O. Baker, East Tennessee State University
Christoper D. Bader, Chapman UniversityFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2-10-2025

Abstract

There is growing recognition of the prevalence of paranormal beliefs in Western countries. However, most of this interest has been focused on the United States and robust, comparative data remain limited. This study extends this literature to report findings from a national survey of the United Kingdom designed to assess the prevalence and patterns of paranormal beliefs. Although there are many similarities to previous research, the results also suggest that there are significant differences in the scope, clustering, and patterns of paranormalism across contexts. The study makes four contributions to research on the paranormal by a) reiterating the continuing popularity of paranormal beliefs, even in highly secularized locations, with over 70% of people in the United Kingdom believing in something paranormal; b) demonstrating that these beliefs are differentiated across contexts where they might otherwise be assumed to be similar; c) demonstrating the applicability of social control and bounded affinity theories for explaining belief in the paranormal; and, d) documenting how conventional religiosity relates to paranormalism in a relatively secular cultural context. These findings highlight the need for further research on diffuse forms of supernaturalism and the potential for such studies to contribute to important questions about theory and research in sociology.

Comments

This article was originally published in The Sociological Quarterly in 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2025.2461298

Recommended Citation

Clark, T., Baker, J. O., & Bader, C. D. (2025). Marginalized, secularized, and popularized? The prevalence and patterns of paranormal belief in the United Kingdom. The Sociological Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2025.2461298

Peer Reviewed

1

Copyright

The authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.