#### Document Type

Article

#### Publication Date

2013

#### Abstract

Quantum theory can be viewed as a generalization of classical probability theory, but the analogy as it has been developed so far is not complete. Whereas themanner in which inferences aremade in classical probability theory is independent of the causal relation that holds between the conditioned variable and the conditioning variable, in the conventional quantum formalism, there is a significant difference between how one treats experiments involving two systems at a single time and those involving a single system at two times. In this article, we develop the formalism of *quantum conditional states*, which provides a unified description of these two sorts of experiment. In addition, concepts that are distinct in the conventional formalism become unified: Channels, sets of states, and positive operator valued measures are all seen to be instances of conditional states; the action of a channel on a state, ensemble averaging, the Born rule, the composition of channels, and nonselective state-update rules are all seen to be instances of belief propagation. Using a quantum generalization of Bayes’ theorem and the associated notion of Bayesian conditioning, we also show that the remote steering of quantum states can be described within our formalism as a mere updating of beliefs about one system given new information about another, and retrodictive inferences can be expressed using the same belief propagation rule as is used for predictive inferences. Finally, we show that previous arguments for interpreting the projection postulate as a quantum generalization of Bayesian conditioning are based on a misleading analogy and that it is best understood as a combination of belief propagation (corresponding to the nonselective state-update map) and conditioning on the measurement outcome.

#### Recommended Citation

Leifer, M.S., Spekkens, R.W., 2013. Towards a formulation of quantum theory as a causally neutral theory of Bayesian inference. *Phys. Rev. A 88*, 052130. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052130

#### Peer Reviewed

1

#### Copyright

American Physical Society

## Comments

This article was originally published in

Physical Review A, volume 88, in 2013. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052130