Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2013
Abstract
Can “house money” explain asset market bubbles? We test this hypothesis in an asset market experiment with a certain dividend. We compare experiments where the initial portfolio of cash and shares is given to subjects, i.e. house money, to a treatment in which individual initial portfolios are constructed using subject earned money from a real effort task. We find that bubbles still occur; however trading volumes are significantly abated and the dispersion of earnings is significantly lower when subjects earn their starting endowments. We further investigate the role of cognitive ability in accounting for the differences in earnings distribution across treatments by using the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT). We find that high CRT subjects earned more money on average than the initial value of their portfolio while low CRT subjects earned less. Subjects with low CRT scores were net purchasers (sellers) of shares when the price was above (below) fundamental value while the opposite was true for subjects with high CRT scores. ∗
Recommended Citation
Corgnet, B., Hérnan-Gonzalez, H., Kujal, P., & Porter, D. (2013). The effect of earned vs. house money on price bubble formation in experimental asset markets. ESI Working Paper 13-04. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/54
Comments
Working Paper 13-04