Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2013
Abstract
Objective Psychological and physical health are often conceptualized as the absence of disease, but less research addresses positive psychological and physical functioning. For example, optimism has been linked with reduced disease risk and biological dysfunction, but very little research has examined associations with markers of healthy biological functioning. Thus, we investigated the association between two indicators of positive health: optimism and serum antioxidants.
Methods The cross-sectional association between optimism and antioxidant concentrations was examined in 982 men and women from the Midlife in the United States study. Primary measures included self-reported optimism (assessed with the revised Life Orientation Test) and serum concentrations of nine different antioxidants (carotenoids and Vitamin E). Regression analyses examined the relationship between optimism and antioxidant concentrations in models adjusted for demographics, health status, and health behaviors.
Results For every standard deviation increase in optimism, carotenoid concentrations increased by 3–13% in age-adjusted models. Controlling for demographic characteristics and health status attenuated this association. Fruit and vegetable consumption and smoking status were identified as potential pathways underlying the association between optimism and serum carotenoids. Optimism was not significantly associated with Vitamin E.
Conclusions Optimism was associated with greater carotenoid concentrations and this association was partially explained by diet and smoking status. The direction of effects cannot be conclusively determined. Effects may be bidirectional given that optimists are likely to engage in health behaviors associated with more serum antioxidants, and more serum antioxidants are likely associated with better physical health that enhances optimism.
Recommended Citation
Boehm, Julia K., et al. (2013). "The Association between Optimism and Serum Antioxidants in the Midlife in the United States Study." Psychosomatic medicine 75(1), 2-10. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31827c08a9
Copyright
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Comments
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Psychosomatic Medicine, volume 75, issue 1, 2013 following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at DOI:10.1097/PSY.0b013e31827c08a9.