Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2012
Abstract
This study examines behavior of subjects in simultaneous and sequential multi-battle contests. In simultaneous contests, subjects make positive bids in each battle 80% of the time and bids fall within the predicted boundaries. However, 35% of the time subjects make positive bids in only two, instead of all three, battles and they significantly overuse moderately high bids. In sequential contests, theory predicts sizable bids in the first battle and no bids in the subsequent battles. Contrary to this prediction, subjects significantly underbid in the first battle and overbid in subsequent battles. Consequently, instead of always ending in the second battle, contest proceeds to the third battle 38% of the time. Finally, in both simultaneous and sequential settings, subjects make higher aggregate bids than predicted resulting in negative expected payoffs.
Recommended Citation
Mago, S.D. and Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Multi-battle contests: An experimental study. ESI Working Paper 12-06. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/82
Comments
Working Paper 12-06