Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2010
Abstract
Researchers have found that an individual’s risk attitude is not stable across elicitation methods. Results reported by Deck et al. (2009) suggest that personality may help explain the apparent inconsistency, offering support to Borghans et al.’s (2008) argument that economists should consider a multi‐domain approach to measuring risk attitudes. This paper uses laboratory methods to compare risk attitudes as measured by the Holt and Laury (2002) procedure under two different frames. We find that, as in Deck et al. (2009), one’s willingness to take financial risks (as measured by Weber et al. 2002) significantly affects behavior; however the effect is significantly greater when the task is framed as a financial decision. This paper also asks whether personality can explain the well documented behavioral difference between first price and Dutch auctions. While one’s gambling attitude (as measured by Weber et al. 2002) affects bidding behavior, it does not do so differentially between auction formats.
Recommended Citation
Deck, C., Lee, J., & Reyes, J. (2010). Personality and the consistency of risk taking behavior: Experimental evidence. ESI Working Paper 10-15. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/116
Comments
Working Paper 10-15