Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-27-2026
Abstract
The rapid expansion of digital education has accelerated the use of online instructional videos, yet variability in video design and production quality continues to shape learners’ engagement and satisfaction. This study developed and tested a structural equation model to examine predictors of undergraduates’ satisfaction with educational videos. Using survey data from 964 students, learning satisfaction was positively predicted by image clarity (β = 0.381, p < 0.001), learning motivation (β = 0.18, p = 0.006), and interactive behavior (β = 0.182, p = 0.011). In contrast, video attachment tools showed a small negative direct association with satisfaction (β = −0.116, p = 0.042). Teacher performance and video attachment tools influenced satisfaction indirectly by shaping learners’ motivation and interactive behavior. These relationships were robust across both maximum likelihood and ordinal DWLS estimations. Although learning self-efficacy and learning barriers did not directly predict satisfaction, self-efficacy exerted its influence through motivation, while learning barriers operated through interactive behavior, highlighting distinct affective and behavioral mechanisms. Overall, the model identifies three interrelated dimensions of satisfaction—perceived video quality, intrinsic affective response, and extrinsic behavioral engagement. Practically, the findings suggest prioritizing high visual clarity, carefully designing attachment features (e.g., captions, playback controls) to minimize cognitive and usability burden, and incorporating instructor presence to strengthen motivation and interaction in video-based instruction.
Recommended Citation
Wang, F., Havard, D. & Barnhart, T. Approaching learning satisfaction: Factors influencing educational video learning. Educ Inf Technol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13996-0
Peer Reviewed
1
Copyright
The authors
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Included in
Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Educational Technology Commons, Online and Distance Education Commons
Comments
This article was originally published in Education and Information Technologies in 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13996-0